Therefore, if a plot of land covered by a Torrens title is sold, but the sale is registered under Law 3344, the sale is not considered registered and the registration of the deed is not considered a constructive communication to the whole world. [Mactan-Cebu International Airport Authority v. Tyrol (R.G. 171535, 5 June 2009)]. The only exception to this constructive rule is in favor of a “third party with a better right”, as provided for in Article 194 as amended by Law 3344 and paragraph (b) of Article 113 of Article 1529. A person who is “a third party with better rights” within the meaning of these provisions is sold by the Court of Appeal (G.R. 40145, July 29, 1992) as someone who has acquired other securities independently of the unregistered document, such as prescription titles. Second. 113 of Presidential Decree 1529, also known as the Property Registration Order, provides that “no deed, transfer, mortgage, lease or other voluntary instrument relating to lands not registered under the Torrens system shall be valid, except between the parties, unless such deed has been drawn up in the manner prescribed here at the Registry of Deeds Office of the Province or City, in which the country is located. This provision applies only to instruments created by agreement between the parties and does not include transfers of ministerial officials such as sheriff`s certificates. A falsified document is null and void and therefore does not confer a title, i.e.

null and void. Your registration does not cure infirmity. However, if ownership of the property has been registered and subsequently transfers it to an innocent third party for valuable consideration, the third party acquires proper ownership. In Joaquin v. Madrid, 13551, 30. January 1960, it was decided that if a deed (such as a mortgage deed) is presented for registration, the registered owner does not lose title, and the assignee in the forged deed does not acquire any right or ownership over the property. Therefore, unlike Law 496 (now 1529), registration under Law 3344 does not offer complete protection, as it must be subject to a prior and valid title, even if it is not registered. Future buyers of unregistered land must therefore determine for themselves whether the seller still owns the property at the time of the transaction, and the most practical way to determine this is to go to the property to find the people who actually own the property and ask them in what capacity they own and occupy the property. [Spouse Pulido v.

Court of Appeal, G.R. 109244 (December 29, 1995)]. 2. Subsequently, transactions across the country are recorded, which (a) may be voluntary, i.e. bills of sale, gifts, mortgages; and (b) involuntary, i.e. privileges, seizures. 3. In accordance with Article 194 of the Revised Administrative Code, as amended by Law 3344. However, it is legally stipulated that “the registration of documents in the appropriate register must take place in order to influence and bind the country”. Prior to E.O.

1529, Law 496 (or Land Registry Act) regulated the registration of transactions with Torrens title. On the other hand, Law 3344, as amended, regulated the registration of transactions involving unregistered real estate, without prejudice to a third party with a better right. The Torrens Land Registration System is a land registration system. In this system, what is recorded in the register of deeds is a registration of the owner`s ownership or interest in the land, unlike the system provided for in article 194 of the Revised Administrative Code, as amended by Law 3344, where only proof of ownership is recorded. In this case, the deed of transfer is registered from which the title of the owner emerged – not the title itself. (Q3, 1994 bar) Hey, gud day, say believe a Spanish title, one of the tips on, history of Spanish o.c.t 01-4 same good and null o.c.t > However, there was a case where it was found that the owner of an unregistered property sold it to 2 different people, provided that both sales were valid, the buyer whose purchase contract was first registered under the provisions of Law No. 3344, would have a better right. consultation procedure when the registration of an instrument is refused; These are transactions that involve the land and do not require the consent of the registered owner. In some cases, they may go against the will of the owner. These include, for example, attachment, enforcement fee, lis pendens, etc. 3. Ownership of public land was acquired by fraud or misrepresentation, so it is void from the outset.

(RP v. Animas, 37682, March 29, 1974) 1. Request for a new hearing or reconsideration in accordance with the Rules of Procedure. 2. Appeal within 15 days of notification of the judgment in accordance with the Rules of Procedure. 3. Application for setting aside of a judgment in accordance with the Rules of Procedure. 4. Application for review of the registration order.

(§ 32, 1529) (Q12, 1990 Bar) a. Litigation – registration of private land under the Torrens system.